Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 5:52 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Elane Photography v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who focuses on Justice Ginsburg’s concurring opinion in the case and the prospect that Apel could still have a First Amendment claim, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
The articles by Barnes and Bravin and Kendall also reported on yesterday’s opinion in Kaley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Hasen looks ahead to the anticipated decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses how the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 1993 law “championed by Senate Democrats (including one named Joe Biden) to undermine a Supreme Court ruling written by Justice Antonin Scalia has become the latest obstacle to the Affordable Care Act” – specifically, the law’s contraception mandate, at issue in Sebelius v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
Lyle Denniston covered the order for this blog; other coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Rebecca Shabad of The Hill, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
The case, Alt v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
The SEC's litigation will be led by John V. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Washington, 5 Misc. 3d 957, reversed on other grounds Washington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
Briefly: Following up on Wednesday’s oral argument in Lozano v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
I reported on the oral argument for this blog; other coverage comes from Robert Barnes of The Washington Post (who focuses in particular on the Justices’ “New York state of mind” and Justice Breyer’s apparent confusion of Iowa and Illinois in the argument), Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:38 am
(John Elwood) Robert Barnes’ piece in the Washington Post today recounts a hypothetical from Justice Breyer at yesterday’s argument in Lozano v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:51 am
Coverage comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:13 am
Argentina, while Robert Barnes of The Washington Post previews Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:58 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses this Term’s merits docket and the possible reasons why that docket has “the potential of a historic low. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:20 am
But as Robert Barnes put it in the Washington Post, CT “didn’t seem particularly interested in Sykes’s questions about the workings of the modern court. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:45 am
But NFIB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Mark Wolf at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Elizabeth LaForgia of JURIST (who also covers the other oral arguments yesterday), and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
