Search for: "Washington v. Roberts" Results 601 - 620 of 4,695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 1:50 pm by lennyesq
By Ruth Marcus *** In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Keenan, decided Feb. 5 by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct but just posted on Westlaw (some paragraph breaks and numbering deleted); the opinion is signed by members Ruth Reukauf, Robert Alsdorf, Ramon Alvarez, Wanda Briggs, Kristian Hedine, Rich Melnick, and Michael Tate: At all times pertinent hereto, Judge Keenan was a Superior Court Judge [in the civil department] for King County, Washington…. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Request to Withhold Jan. 6 Materials from House Committee Investigating Capitol Riot MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The Supreme Court rejected former President Trump’s request to block the release of some of his White House records to a congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  A Washington lawyer told AVCO that not only could Willebrandt handle the legal phases of the operation; she also had “the necessary contacts,” including her good friend Postmaster General Brown! [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 6:59 am by James Romoser
Colb, Dorf on Law) Sarah Weddington, Who Successfully Argued Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Nearly 50,000 Facebook users in 100+ countries have been targeted by surveillance companies, The Washington Post reports. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Emily Dai
The bulk of the report comes in Sections IV and V, which give detailed timelines of the events leading up to and during the Jan. 6 riot. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
The Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment exist to put some issues off limits for majority rule — as Justice Robert H. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]