Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 4,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  At the same time though, there will be a new “high-water mark” of criminal enforcement. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 1:17 pm by National Indian Law Library
Jewell (federal reserved water rights, Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act) on 11/04/13. * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Wyandotte Nation v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
Originally, maritime or admiralty law was applicable when any claim arose upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:02 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Guidance Improving EPA Review of Appalachian Surface Coal Mining Operations Under the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Environmental Justice Executive Order on July 31st. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:02 pm by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Guidance Improving EPA Review of Appalachian Surface Coal Mining Operations Under the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Environmental Justice Executive Order on July 31st. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 7:31 am by Steven Cohen
SMITH CORPORATION – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – August 30th, 2018) involves a product liability claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 3:50 am
United States (07-513) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], where the Court will decide whether evidence seized during a search incident to an arrest must be suppressed when the sole premise for the arrest was information later found to be negligently [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm by lennyesq
The EPA and Department of the Army announced a final rule amending the definition of protected “waters of the United States” in light of the decision in Sackett v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:01 pm by Miriam Seifter
Most recently, when the Obama administration issued the “Clean Water Rule,” also known as the Waters of the United States Rule, over 100 parties across the country sued to challenge it. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project - Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]