Search for: "Wells v. Department of Health and Human Services" Results 601 - 620 of 1,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The Principles of Disclosure of the deskbook of the Public Prosecutions Service of Canada say this (in section 4.1, “third party information”, footnotes omitted): Information in the possession of third parties such as boards, social agencies, other government departments, rape crisis centres, women’s shelters, doctors’ offices, mental health and counselling services or foreign law enforcement agencies is not in the possession of Crown… [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
IN THE COURTS:  Dean (Zain Taj) v Lord Advocate: the Supreme Court has ruled that the prison conditions in Taiwan are such that any extradition would breach the Human Rights Convention. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
Missouri’s Department of Natural Resources runs the grant program, which provides grants to nonprofit organizations like child care centers and schools, in order to make use of old scrap tires as well as improve children’s safety. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am by Guest Contributor
 Department of Health [2017] UKSC 41 has announced her intention to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
 Department of Health [2017] UKSC 41, 14 June 2017 – judgment here; previous post here. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the PrerogativeRichard Drabble6. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
The issues before the Supreme Court were: (1)  Whether Ali v Birmingham City Council [2010] 2 AC 39 should be departed from in the light of Ali v United Kingdom (2016) 63 EHRR 20 and if so to what extent; (2) Whether the reviewing officer should have asked himself whether there was a real risk that the appellant’s mental health would be damaged by moving into the accommodation offered, whether or not her reaction to it was irrational, and if so, whether… [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).… [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Despite keeping the party together for key votes on her cabinet (losing only the vote to put an expert on vaccines in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services), the Supreme Court fight led to disaster.When Clinton appeared with top Senate Democrats to make the case for abolishing the filibuster, it appeared that they had found a way to use sheer numbers against Republicans. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am by Steven Koprince
In a recent decision, Judge Eric Bruggink didn’t hold mince words, using terms like “agency misconduct,” “untruthful,” and “lack of commitment to the integrity of the process,” among other none-too-subtle phrases, to describe the actions of the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Currently, Washington, DC’s alphabet agencies are operating overtime – the Department of Health and Human Services regulating healthcare, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau imposing the Dodd-Frank Act, the EPA setting global warming standards, and on and on. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 6:02 pm by Joy Waltemath
His claims under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) were also tossed because the wellness program required him to provide “personal health information” but did not request genetic information (Fuentes v. [read post]
Although the guidance primarily focused on the use of copay coupons under Medicare Part D, the agency specifically noted that the prohibition applies to all federal health care programs. [read post]