Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 601 - 620
of 12,259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied defendants’ motion (Pirani v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:49 am
Previously BAAQMD had published guidelines in 2012, which were the subject of litigation culminating in the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:03 am
See Quinn v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Monday's decision in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, where he drafted orders and bench memoranda in a wide range of civil cases, as well as criminal proceedings. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
Carney of the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction in Boland v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In Abrams (1922), an intermediate appellate court overturned the order of California’s blue-sky administrator suspending a dealer’s license on the ground that a security he offered was fraudulent. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am
. [* * *] In 2016, Google received a copy of a Miami-Dade County default judgment in MergeworthRX, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm
A subsequent outbreak in California in 1985 confirmed the role of food in disseminating listeriosis. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
From Peterson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 8:13 am
Twitter; PragerU v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am
Rice’s ruling preserved, for the time being, access to the drug in at least the 17 states involved, as well as the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
From State v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
In states such as California, which already regulates all WOTUS as well as additional “waters of the state” under state law, the decision may result in some discharges requiring waste discharge requirements issued under state law rather than receiving state approval through water quality certification issued under Clean Water Act Section 401. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
Both California and federal laws protect employees against workplace harassment by customers, as well as colleagues and supervisors. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
