Search for: "White v. Does 1-21" Results 601 - 620 of 902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am by Devlin Hartline
The exchange of e-mails, however, does not satisfy the statutory requirement of a written instrument signed by the Defendants. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
Considering (1), the Court of Appeals noted that G.S. 90-95.1 defines the offense of CCE, and that the federal crime in 21 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Goldman
Ohio Sept. 21, 2017): Plaintiff does not dispute that the LinkedIn User Agreement authorizes Defendants to remove user content at the company’s discretion. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the disjunction between popular voting and presidential electoral success, which arises because of the mal-distribution of the Senate and its carry-forward to the number of votes in the Electoral College, contributes to the present unhappy situation, as does the malapportioned Senate’s role in the confirmation process. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
We’ve seen unlawful tactics on full display in cases where the SEC has charged “influencers” for touting unregistered crypto asset offerings to investors without disclosing that they are being compensated to do so.[18] We even charged one celebrity with making materially false and misleading tweets about supposed returns from his crypto investments while not disclosing that he was being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for his tweets.[19] Whether it’s the direct result… [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In 1996, the Supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the 100:1 crack-to-powder cocaine sentencing ratio.in Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 11:08 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Recently, my attention was drawn to a 1998 Sotomayer decision from Nasrallah v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Now, a federal district court has ruled on a habeas petition by a defendant convicted under the Florida statute, holding in Shelton v. [read post]