Search for: "Will v. Hughes" Results 601 - 620 of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by JONATHAN DAVIES AND ELLIOT GOLD
When a judicial review was brought against the decision of a misconduct hearing panel, the defendant was the chief constable of that force: see R (Gannon) v Chief Constable of Merseyside [2009] EWHC 2133 (Admin) and R (Evans) v Chief Constable of Sussex [2011] EWHC 2329 (not available on Bailii or ICLR). [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 7:34 am by Doorey
  It was also cited recently by the Supreme Court of Canada in Potter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Barnabei v Chadds Ford Township Zoning Hearing Board, 2015 WL 3609316 (PA Commwlth 6/10/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:00 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
And petitioner’s proposed “unpredictability test”—that a judicial taking consists of a decision that “constitutes a sudden change in state law, unpredictable in terms of relevant precedents,” Hughes v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Epiphany Community Nursery Sch. v Levey  2019 NY Slip Op 00842  Decided on February 5, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department  Singh, J., J. is not primarily about accounting malpractice. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:29 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telefonica O2 UK Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1002 (25 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AC v Farooq & Anor [2012] EWHC 1484 (QB) (30 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Davies v AIB Group (UK) Plc [2012] EWHC 2178 (Ch) (27 July 2012) Hughes & Ors v Bourne & Ors [2012] EWHC 2232 (Ch) (27 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 23 February 2010 and is the first part of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am by Orin S. Kerr
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred by: (1) holding that the warrant to search the defendant's cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement, see People v Hughes, 506 Mich 512, 538 (2020); (2) failing to sever any valid portions of the search warrant from any invalid portions, see People v Keller, 479 Mich 467, 479 (2007); (3) holding that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply, see People… [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Hughes (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (8) (link to cases): Donald L. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]