Search for: "Williams v. Doe"
Results 601 - 620
of 7,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 10:03 am
In a fairly short period of time we have seen Williams, State v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:16 am
The May 25, 2022, Court of Appeals opinion in the case of Williams v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:30 am
By William W. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm
Sophia Dodd for the Atlanta History Center on Reproductive Rights in Georgia: Doe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 pm
Joseph Wendt of Barnes & Thornburg LLPDefendant: T’Shirt Factory, Freedom Custom Z, Shamir Harutyunyan, Does 1-10Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Trademark CounterfeitingCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge William T. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:12 am
CafePress * Cafepress Suffers Potentially Significant Trademark Loss for Users’ Uploaded Designs * Life May Be “Rad,” But This Trademark Lawsuit Isn’t–Williams v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
On October 23, 2009, the California Court of Appeal held in Pineda v Williams-Sonoma it was not unlawful for Williams-Sonoma to ask Pineda for her zip code at the time of purchase, even if that zip code was later used to obtain, view, and distribute her addresses to third parties. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:27 pm
Williams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:22 am
App., October 26, 2017) (declining to overturn Lamont's termination for his refusal to take an alcohol test: the Board properly relied on Lamont's insubordination as grounds to uphold termination, and Lamont received adequate notice of those grounds)*Williams v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
More (counsel for UFCWU, argued before Supreme Court) William J. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
More (counsel for UFCWU, argued before Supreme Court) William J. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Williams and Bell v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:13 am
Any appellate court decision that begins with a scene from Twelve Angry Men, and Stephen Reinhardt's opinion from the 9th Circuit in Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
When he or she does, I hope CAAF will take the opportunity to overrule its summary disposition in Williams. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:03 pm
William Davis Jr. both address traffic stops. [read post]
