Search for: "Williamson v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
Carolene Products Co., supra, at 152; see also Williamson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 938 A.2d 417 (Pa. 2007) (3-2 decision with two concurrences in the result), was not even cited in Maya. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 10:38 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 284 N.J. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:10 pm
Central Time, the Texas Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Severance v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
But Hibbs said a case styled Holder v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
See California Civil Discovery Practice, 4th Edition, (CEB 2019) §3.157A citing Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 2:38 pm
Now, under Watkins v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
The city relied upon the ripeness rule of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
Herbert Hovenkamp, the Ben V. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Moon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
(See CFTC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 11:21 am
In fact, the Georgia Law Enforcement Handbook and the Official Code of Georgia that Investigator Burgamy used for his reference specifically stated that the criminal defamation statute "has been held unconstitutional in the case of Williamson versus State 1982. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
