Search for: "Wills v. U.s.*" Results 601 - 620 of 1,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2017, 8:38 am by Aurora Barnes
§ 1681b; and (2) whether a bare procedural violation of a statute may be deemed “willful”—i.e. knowing and reckless—under Safeco Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Obviously this is just one instance of exclusion by the OU, but Fromer suggests the OU's actions against Jezebel indicate the OU is both willing and able to use its certification mark "in troublesome ways that exceed the scope of its certification and might hurt both consumers and fair competition. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court also granted cert this term in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]