Search for: "Word v. Lord" Results 601 - 620 of 2,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm by Isabel McArdle
 (Paragraph 31) Lord Justice Patten and Lord Justice Maurice Kay agreed. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In the late 19th century, Lord Shand observed at page 1113 of Godfrey v W & D C Thomson (1890) 17 R 1108: “… I think that in these times persons must be allowed to speak pretty freely of public political conduct and principles …” Mr Crow aruged that the leaflets were capable of meaning that he was one of those involved in the scandals, waste and other matters referred to. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
Accordingly we accept the thrust of Mr Norton-Taylor’s second submission, if not the precise wording. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
"While Jacob LJ in Saint Gobain PAM SA v Fusion-Provida Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 177 (Katpost) articulated a test that appeared to be rather general – it must be "more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work", Floyd LJ has now clarified that this “is far from being a test of universal application”, quoting with approval the warning of Kitchin LJ in Novartis AG v Generics (UK) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1623 (Katpost) against… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:14 am by Alasdair Henderson
ANS v ML [2012] UKSC 30 - read judgment / press summary Another week and another judgment about adoption. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin
It finally used the word "huh? [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
This is a guest post by Allan Norman of Celtic Knot following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Twenty years ago, on Thursday 6 May 2004, the House of Lords delivered its landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
  By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
In 2000, the House of Lords effectively approved these conditions, in the landmark case on the point - Inco Europe v. [read post]