Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
In feudal European societies it was shameful and often even illegal to sell or mortgage land: a lord’s duty was to preserve his land and devise it intact to his eldest son. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Lord Denning suggested as much in Bater: “[t]he difference of opinion which has been evoked about the standard of proof in these cases may well turn out to be more a matter of words than anything else. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed and Lord Sumption. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
Trinidad A High Court has ruled that the spoken word can within the law of libel and not just of slander. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm
In other words, how are companies supposed to check the veracity of the information when they are not permitted to inform the person in question there is a problem? [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm
” In line with Leggatt J, I prefer to try to determine the truth by applying the dissenting speech of Lord Pearce in Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 403, HL: “’Credibility’ involves wider problems than mere ‘demeanour’ which is mostly concerned with whether the witness appears to be telling the truth as he now believes it to be. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The notice names one Allan V. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
In other words, is this provision “necessary to reconcile the right to privacy with the rules governing freedom of expression”? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
The words “Fuck Tory Scum” were sprayed on a war memorial in Whitehall. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
In other cases of redaction of a judgment to protect the anonymity of those involved or mentioned we have seen judges use [square brackets] to flag where words have been removed. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
First, Mr Paulley argued that the notice should have been more strongly worded. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am
Oh, lord no. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy The Hunton & Williams blog reports that on 1 February 2017, the UK Minister responsible for data protection gave evidence to a House of Lords Committee about the Government’s position on the GDPR. [read post]
