Search for: "v. AT" Results 601 - 620 of 493,615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:45 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Discharge of counsel — Rule 4-215 violation Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, at which he represented himself, Eric Darnell Thomas, Sr., appellant, was convicted of possession with intent to distribute buprenorphine; possession of cocaine; possession of buprenorphine; possession of oxycodone; and possession of ammunition by a […] [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:41 am by Unreported Opinions
Real property law — Foreclosure — Declaratory judgment Valedia Gross, appellant, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City wherein she sought to invalidate the Deed of Trust that had encumbered her real property prior to it being sold at a foreclosure auction. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:39 am by Unreported Opinions
Employment law — Wrongful termination — Ineffective assistance of counsel Patricia Smith, appellant, appeals from an order issued by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County granting summary judgment in favor of the State of Maryland, appellee, on her complaint for retaliation and wrongful termination. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:33 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Unpreserved Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Bobby Leroy Daniels, III, appellant, was convicted of second-degree murder and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:26 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Mandatory hearing — Dissatisfaction with counsel Bobbie Sue Hodge, appellant, was charged with multiple counts of arson, murder, and assault after setting a fire at her home in 2019. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:20 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Unmerged convictions Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County, Carl Robert Alexander, appellant, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter; first-degree assault; use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun; possession of ammunition; and possession of […] [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:05 am by privacylawyer
As Evans J.A. wrote for this Court: “determining the characteristics of the ‘reasonable person’ presents difficulties in a situation where reasonable people may view a matter differently, depending, in part, on their perspective… However, the view of the reasonable person in legal tests represents a normative standard constructed by the courts, not an actuality that can be empirically verified” (Taylor v. [read post]