Search for: "v. Atkins" Results 601 - 620 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by cdw
Maldonado is mentally retarded under Atkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Brian Stull, Capital Punishment Project
" Justice Stevens wrote the court's opinion barring the death penalty for mentally retarded people as cruel and unusual punishment (link to Atkins v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
The cases we have discussed on implied exclusion of Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act are composed of three variants – first, the contract designates a foreign proper law but no seat of arbitration (for example Indtel Technical Services v WS Atkins and Citation Infowares v Equinox Corporation), secondly, the contract designates a foreign seat of arbitration but no proper law, and thirdly the contract designates a foreign proper law and a foreign seat of… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm by cdw
Commonwealth tackles the intersection of Atkins and competency. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
Moreover, to paraphrase Atkin LJ, the doors had been made part of the flat itself in the course of its construction. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:14 am
Michael Atkins recaps the ruling and case's history [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:24 pm by cdw
LEXIS 3 (Neb 1/8/2010))(dissent) Relief denied on a grab bag of direct appeal claims, most notably Atkins. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
Virginia) and those who were under 18 at the time of their crime (Roper v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Cain, 13-1433, is a capital case from the world’s prison capitol that asks “[w]hether a state court that considers evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by Ron Coleman
All this is by way of linking to Michael Atkins’s recent post on the latest statement on the topic of that elusive “exceptional case,” this one on the other side of the continent, in a Ninth Circuit case called Haas Automation, Inc. v. [read post]