Search for: "v. BROWN et al" Results 601 - 620 of 995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
Finally - and I think this is quite a big one - it is wrong to say (as His Lordship does and as Doran did) that Kay, Doherty et al are authority for the proposition that a challenge to the decision to seek possession has to be framed as a Wednesbury unreasonableness challenge. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 7:54 am
Both of the rulings — Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Abella and Brown JJ. are of the view that the documents sought by the defence do not meet the threshold of “likely relevance” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm by Pace Law School Library
L. 79-93 (2010).COASTAL AREAS.Kalen, Sam, et al., Lingering relevance of the Coastal Zone Management Act to energy development in our nation’s coastal waters? [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
Saltzburg et al., Military Rules of Evidence Manual 4-223 (6th ed. 2006). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]