Search for: "v. Lawson" Results 601 - 620 of 791
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Libby Payne, Olswang LLP
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
The issue for the Supreme Court is what the correct test is for determining whether an ET has jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim brought by a person who works abroad for a UK company in light of Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal Civil Division) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva [2011] EWCA Civ 1255 (03 November 2011) Smithurst v Sealant Construction Services Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1277 (03 November 2011) Dance v Savery & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1250 (03 November 2011) BVM Management Ltd v Yeomans (t/a the Great Hall At Mains) & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1254 (03 November 2011) Drake & Anor v Fripp [2011] EWCA Civ 1279 (03 November 2011) High Court… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
POLIS has a report on an investigative journalism and human rights event, featuring Anthea Lawson and Robert Palmer, journalists/campaigners from Global Witness. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:55 am by Don Cruse
The contractor claims that, because a city cannot be immune from a constitutional takings suit, it cannot be immune from suit over a contract settling such a dispute under the plurality opinion in Lawson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Lawson Lundell
This blog post was written by Parveen Karsan, previously an Associate with Lawson Lundell LLP. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:24 am by Steven G. Pearl
(See Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d at pp. 855–864, 143 Cal.Rptr. 695, 574 P.2d 766; Harding Lawson Associates v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Aug. 10, 2011) (applying Concepcion and upholding a no-class-action arbitration clause) Lawson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:36 pm by Ricardo Bascuas
There is so little going on that I tried to read the Eleventh Circuit’s latest website publication, Lawson v. [read post]