Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 10,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
AND HILLVALE MEDICAL GROUP ASSOCIATION D/B/A HILLVALE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-00063-CV, 198 SW3d 96, 04-27-06 Opinion of the Dallas court of Appeals) 2 petitions. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:40 am
Turns out (a) she’d moved and never told opposing counsel of her new address; (b) the defendants’ motion got to her anyway a week after they’d filed it, and (c) she’d filed a brief in opposition to the motion. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this general license, all transactions and activities proh [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Therefore the Court is not being asked to provide an impermissible advisory opinion. c. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 11:24 am
Joan C. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:17 pm
(b) Exceptions. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
§ 782.104(a)(1)(2)(d). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:26 am
Es importante salvar una b o una v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am
(I omitted the substance of the chats (a) because I’m sure you can imagine what they said and (b) because they’d made this post way, way too long if I included them.) [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:43 am
Igualmente excluye al delito tributario, salvo que se cometa por una declaración intencionalmente falsa, o por una omisión intencional, con el objeto de ocultar ingresos provenientes de cualquier otro delito, reconoció el estándar de “causa probable” pero solo como excepción, cambiando con ello la orientación de la Ley 24710 que obligaba a presentar las pruebas del hecho (Artículo 17.c), y de la participación del reclamado… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:16 pm
Google Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
§ 202.5(c). [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
§ 202.5(c). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Supp.2d ___, 2009 WL 3352859 (D. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
C-14—C-15. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
There have been further filings since the Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
The document says that a change only in colour does not alter the distinctive character of a trade mark, as long as (a) the word/figurative elements coincide and are the main distinctive elements, (b) the contrast of shades is respected, (c) the colour or combination of colours does not possess distinctive character in itself, and (d) colour is not one of the main contributors to the overall distinctiveness of the mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV, Case C-149/11 indicates the use needed to support an EU registration, as follows:a) Territorial scope of use is one of the relevant factors;b) It cannot be ruled out that use in a single member state can support an EU registration;c) Use needs to be sufficient or create or maintain a market share;d) No de minimus level of use can be defined.Other factors to consider include the scale and frequency of use, the nature of… [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:27 pm
Alternatives for expanding this: (a) have that section initialed; (b) add a representation that the borrower's counsel also reviewed the loan documents; (c) have the statement made/signed on a separate document; and/or (d) include a representation that the statement is made under penalty of perjury. 5. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 6:49 am
Encore quand il sera, c’orient pour votre travail d’enter vous fabriquer votre propre opinion via un salle de jeu un peu. [read post]
