Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
State Bar of Arizona in 1977, when the Supreme Court ruled that states could only regulate advertising by attorneys only to the extent necessary to prevent "false, deceptive, or misleading communication. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:54 am
A Class Apart is based upon BYU Professor Ignacio Garcia's recently released book White But Not Equal: Mexican Americans, Jury Discrimination and the Supreme Court (University of Arizona Press, 2009). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Novartis appealed the Second Circuit’s decision, and in February 2011, the United States Supreme Court denied Novartis’ petition for review. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:47 pm
I share Kozinski’s sense that the Supreme Court will take this case and reverse. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
The Tenth Circuit opinion in Baca recognized this, quoting Supreme Court authority for the proposition that the power of states to appoint presidential electors is plenary.What does all this mean for the question of faithless electors? [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
I was born the year before the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland BK 599/1 44 6/22/23 21-1484 Arizona v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland BK 599/1 44 6/22/23 21-1484 Arizona v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:11 am
After all, it reversed a judgment of the Florida Supreme Court that had ordered relief for Gore. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:00 pm
This week, the Supreme Court ruled that appeals courts were wrong to deny qualified immunity to police officers in two separate cases, each of them involving unruly suspects in fast-developing situations. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 7:31 am
[Justices Thomas and Gorusch write that an executive-branch policy is not "'Law' for purposes of the Supremacy Clause"] Today the Supreme Court denied review in Lipschultz v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:57 pm
This standard has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, as held by the rights given under the 4th Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Supreme Court needs to take this issue up. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
” Supreme Court Justices are on-the-ball kind of folks, so I knew the event would be fine, just fine. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Elite members of the Supreme Court bar have had a good year. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
Supreme Court decision in Gant v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:32 am
Supreme Court is “slic[ing] off pieces of the famous 1966 criminal rights case, Miranda v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist didn’t.) [read post]
