Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 6,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
" California Appellate Districts, January 24, 2008 "County of L.A. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:22 pm
"The American public must understand that this situation is no longer about illegal immigration or narcotics trafficking," said David V. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:48 pm
The California Supreme Court decided Ross v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 6:00 pm
Sentencing Law and Policy has a post about a new Third Circuit case, Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
In October 2006, the Central District Court of California in the case U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
This apparently was the case regardless of the ultimate outcome in court of the Otay v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
A California (where else?) [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:06 pm
Link: AP via MSNBC.comLink: Orlando v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:04 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:37 pm
Besides the legal nullity of the contract, this addition indicates the unwillingness on the part of the legislature to force the courts to adjudicate or even recognize the parties' intentions. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
However, this year, the California Supreme Court ruled in Gattuso v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
