Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 12,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm
Occasionally though, the dispute becomes more complicated either because the potential litigation traverses unique or different areas of law or because the IP attorney or his/her client wants it to or because his opponent does. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:58 am
It does not apply to employees in supervisory roles, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
The TPP excludes existing local government regulation from the scope of the four big service requirements in Article 10.7 (1)(a)(iii). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
The Securities Act of 1933 does not permit the SEC to bring an enforcement action on behalf of an individual investor; however, individual investors are permitted to bring civil actions under several of its sections as noted below: ■ Section 5 and Section 12(a)(1) allow purchasers (investors) to sue issuers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The exclusion obviously covers existing provincial rules (as well as renewals and amendments of such measures), but does not address new regulations. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:32 pm
Okanagan Indian Band: [40] … 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
They argue that the request does not require Apple to create a “backdoor” to every iPhone, and that Apple will be allowed to keep possession and destroy the software created to hack into the San Bernardino shooter’s phone after it has been used. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
” Id. at § 12102(1)(A). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:24 am
” What does this section do? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
What does this have to do with the TPP? [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
Moreover, there are concerns that Canadian protection for well-known marks does not meet TPP requirements, leading to further TPP-mandated amendments. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
Running the numbers then, the total fee on a $1 million New York estate would be $34,000, or 3.4%. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
The Committee was “disappointed to note” that the Bill does not cover all the intelligence and security Agencies’ intrusive capabilities, and that the draft Bill fails to provide a clear and comprehensive legal framework to govern the use and oversight of investigatory powers. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
He records that : 18 of the 29 children in the report were not subject to any form of court proceedings. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Birmingham argued that these were issues for the council to decide, subject only to conventional public law grounds, following Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:18 pm
The fact-finding hearing was conducted on July 29, 2008, November 17, 2008 and January 7, 2009. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:01 pm
The submission of a list of registrations does not make the registrations of record. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
What does this have to do with the TPP? [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:36 pm
" (Tab B, p.19, para 1) Tab B, p. 37, para 1, tic 2, sentence 2: Interrogation training began in November 2002, not November 2003. [read post]