Search for: "High v State" Results 6181 - 6200 of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
This vignette takes place after the oral argument in the Watergate tapes case (United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
A group of Catholic schools and parents of students in the schools filed suit this week in a Michigan federal district court challenging the state's latest COVID-19 Order which temporarily bars in-person instruction in high schools. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Jennifer Elisa Smith, University of Maryland Law School, has posted United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 2:03 pm
United States immunity decision, into the upcoming election. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 57710 (ED CA, May 31, 2011), a California federal magistrate judge rejected a claim by a state prisoner that his rights were violated when unidentified prison mail room staff confiscated tarot cards, incense, an incense burner, and a set of gem stones sent as a donation to the Lefthand Path, a religion in which Plaintiff was a high priest.In Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by V.Venkatesan
By Renu GuptaGuest BloggerThis post refers to Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttaranchal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but… [read post]