Search for: "Holmes"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 6,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:11 pm
The Colorado Civil Justice League correctly identifies its unfairness: The CCJL would like to thank Chris Ottele from the law firm of Holme, Roberts and Owen for his tireless work helping us negotiate a satisfactory settlement over a particularly troubling... [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 2:49 pm
Eleanor Holmes-Norton (D-D.C.) [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:32 pm
Kate Andrejack Holmes, 206-373-6521 kholmes@attenex.com Mentions: Attenex Corporation - web site | Socha Consulting listing [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:05 pm
Eleanor Holmes-Norton Rep. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 10:43 am
He admonished that this kind of slavish adherence to boilerplate disclosure is what the SEC is trying to stamp out.Noting that it was the birthday of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Chairman Cox wondered why, if Justice Holmes could cover great legal theories in one page of clean prose with no jargon, a proxy statement cannot tell readers what they need to know about the boss's pay in the same way.Finally, the chair took the opportunity to extol the virtues of the new mandated… [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:48 am
Had an interesting lunch on Friday with Nick Holmes, Binary Law - wide ranging discussion and, of course, I had to join him in a glass or two of Rioja. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:56 pm
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. once said, ""The life of the law has not been logic, but experience. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:15 am
Before ending up on the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. spent a couple of months as a law professor, during which time, according to Harold Berman, he taught his students that, "Your business as lawyers is to see the relation between your particular fact and the whole frame of the universe. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:19 am
.
Holmes v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
"
"A potent precedent favoring the constitutionally-questionable provisions of the United States Patriot Act passed shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the 1917 law was given the Supreme Court's approval in Schenk v United States, when Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, 'When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight....' "
… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:58 pm
Lawyers, at least, are subject to an ethical code that goes significantly further than this fraternity-version of Holmes would suggest.) [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:09 pm
Michael Risinger "Boxes in Boxes: Julian Barnes, Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and the Edalji Case".http://www.bepress.com/ice/vol4/iss2/art3Douglas Walton and Burkhard Schafer "Arthur, George and the Mystery of the Missing Motive: Towards a Theory of Evidentiary Reasoning about Motives".http://www.bepress.com/ice/vol4/iss2/art4Cross posted to The Seamless Web. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
Holmes offers a rule: The driver must stop and look. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:53 am
In May/June, Nick Holmes of Binary Law will join her as co-editor. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 10:15 am
One gasps in admiration… Even Nick Holmes, Binary Law, is feeling relaxed enough to go off piste and reflect on the fact that it is 40 years ago today… Sgt Pepper. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:36 pm
Other stellar UK blawgs include Jeremy Phillips' IPKat, Nick Holmes' Binary Law and Delia Venables' law sites. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:24 am
(Holmes is not good on this because he's a social Darwinist; he doesn't even believe in truth.) [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:24 pm
Rick Holmes and I published a sixth amendment piece in Cornell, and Randy Wagner and I are circulating a race and law paper that has been my focus for two years. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:16 pm
. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, United States Supreme Court JusticeThe jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the facts in controversy. -- John Jay, 1st Chief Justice of the Supreme CourtThe pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge -- U.S. vs. [read post]