Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 6181 - 6200 of 23,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court nevertheless sets out its views on the underlying issues of law, in the hope that they might assist at later stages of the domestic proceedings. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Michael McCann
For DRI members, the webcast costs $150; for non-members, it's $180.Here are more details:On May 24, 2010, the Supreme Court decided 9-0 against the National Football League (NFL) in American Needle v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
The document goes far beyond what Merpel had hoped for. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm by David Ruiz
  EFF hopes the government can follow the judge’s orders this time. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 8:01 am by Dave
In Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB), the question of the effect of the public sector equality duty under s. 149, Equality Act 2010, on possession proceedings where there had been drugs problems at the property was in issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
Wilkinson and United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]