Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 6181 - 6200 of 8,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State consumer protection statutes? [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
’ for alcohol: the opinion of the Advocate General in OHIM v BORCO (Class 46) Two new references for CJEU: any more news? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:28 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,860,050 entitled APPARATUS FOR SEPARATING LABEL ASSEMBLY and owned byContinental DataLabel. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The article also explains how the Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
- New FDA draft guidance that would change "intended use" based upon mere knowledge of off-label use - Link.June 2, 2011:  The Closing Of The Learned Intermediary Frontier - Updated 50-state learned intermediary rule survey occasioned by first Rhode Island precedent on rule - Link.June 1, 2011:  While Plaintiff Slept, Learned Intermediary Got a Re-affirming Wake Up - New (Dykes) decision where lazy plaintiff lost a learned intermediary motion - Link. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon)   Europe L’Oréal v eBay: a warning to online marketplace operators (JIPLP)   Germany Apple v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm by Jennifer Ko
In addition to their recent paper, Revesz and his co-authors have filed an amicus brief in support of EPA in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:27 am
Anyone who has taught Constitutional Law — like me or the President of the United States — is familiar with the way Chief Justice John Marshall used it in Cohens v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:51 pm by Frank Pasquale
Since the courts have not been very supportive of judicial interventions to enforce Medicaid beneficiaries’ legal rights (given Gonzaga v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:22 am by Bill Marler
Look for “EST. 12612” or “P-12612” inside the USDA mark of inspection on the product labels. [read post]