Search for: "Laws v. State"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 155,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 5:01 pm
As the independent state legislature theory remains in limbo in Moore v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
The Supreme Court yesterday, as expected, granted certiorari to McDonald v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
In Arista v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm
Copied from Immigration Council The United States v. [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Doktor, and Rodman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:40 am
Following Dobbs, many U.S. employers are navigating new state laws and considering a host of new legal issues as they ensure employee access to reproductive health care. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:51 pm
Right to Life PAC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
SepperZubik v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:42 am
I am satisfied that Khadr's detention by the ISI was both arbitrary and illegal, according to the law of Pakistan. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:43 am
Last week the Fifth Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The first is whether a bankruptcy court has power under Article I of the Constitution to determine, where an issue of state property law is involved, that property in the debtor’s possession belongs to the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Muldrow v. [read post]
