Search for: "People v. House" Results 6181 - 6200 of 12,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Although totals are regularly published to the House of Commons, no other information is revealed regarding the claims made. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That’s the question arising out of North Carolina’s recent passage of House Bill 2 (HB 2), a law that takes away existing anti-discrimination rights from LGBT people and makes it impossible for them to seek protection through normal legislative or judicial processes.The Text of HB 2In a single day, during a specially convened legislative session (which apparently cost the North Carolina taxpayers more than $40,000), the North Carolina legislature introduced,… [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
On March 28, 2016, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal announced he will veto a “religious liberties” bill, House Bill 757, which would allow church officials and faith-based groups to deny services to LGBT people based on a “sincerely held religious belief. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
By the way, the recording of Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, High Court, Chancery Division, August 24, 2015 (our note) has been discovered, after so many people have requested it for so long. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Michael DelSignore
” This advancement in technology has raised questions about where the information stored on people’s cell phones falls within the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant became angry, copied the wedding picture at home, added the captions, and hung them in his office “in the union house. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]