Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am
The agency's enabling language is in Article V, Sec. 1a of the state constitution, while its statutory authority lies in Chapter 33 of the Government Code.The agency's budget for FY 2010 from the general revenue fund was was $1,001,626, cut slightly to $948,000 per year over the next biennium. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
" (See Footnote 7) For a court to say that an old man has a meaningful choice if his other option is driving 120 miles round-trip to visit his wife is to make that phrase itself meaningless. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
I had completed a first draft in the state court ruling. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
The panel’s explanations for this ranged from the fact that copyright owners enjoy a much stronger and more coordinated lobby, to the idea that the problem is instinctively clearer in relation to copyright, where the ISP is directly involved in “piping” the copyright-protected material to the end user, unlike with physical branded goods whose actual delivery the ISP merely facilitates.The panel discussion at Simmons & Simmons(photo courtesy of Nedim Malovic)Eleonora Rosati… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm
For example, one of Apple's patent claims-in-suit has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and another patent-in-suit is from the same patent family whose European member has unanimously been deemed invalid by ten judges. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:24 pm
In British Columbia Teachers’ Federation v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Ashlesh Biradar v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:51 pm
(See also Miller v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Primacom (following the earlier ECJ decision in Gasser v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Happy birthdays all round, say the Kats! [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
