Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 6181 - 6200 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
Grows, E&E Publishing (Sept. 9, 2013), http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059986860, archived at http://perma.cc/Q92H- 8ZBC; A Pacific Islands Man Says Climate Change Makes Him a Refugee From His Home, Pub. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
Grows, E&E Publishing (Sept. 9, 2013), http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059986860, archived at http://perma.cc/Q92H- 8ZBC; A Pacific Islands Man Says Climate Change Makes Him a Refugee From His Home, Pub. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
Grows, E&E Publishing (Sept. 9, 2013), http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059986860, archived at http://perma.cc/Q92H- 8ZBC; A Pacific Islands Man Says Climate Change Makes Him a Refugee From His Home, Pub. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
 IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
” It also states that “Category of the not a plugged nickle [sic] means get nothing… . [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
On the video, [Shivers] pointed to the table and stated, `He just threatened me. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]