Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 28,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
"Rehnquist: A Personal Portrait of the Distinguished Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Maher v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Added shortly after publication: It has come to my attention that there was a fifth 2020 lawsuit, Taliaferro et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Duggan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
Lehner has ordered the state to raise judicial pay to reflect cost of living increases since 1998. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
Lehner has ordered the state to raise judicial pay to reflect cost of living increases since 1998. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:07 am
Reasoning by analogy with Boultif v Switzerland he held that the deportation would effectively compel the couple to live permanently apart. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:59 am
Frappolli v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 2:16 am
In Ibrahim v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 6:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
Does the new law only cover contracts where one of the parties lists their mailing address in New York State? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:01 am
The Indiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in Emma McPeek, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:44 am
The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the death penalty for non-homicidal child rape through the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
The Court stated: "the petitioners live in close proximity to the portion of the site that is the subject of the challenged determinations, they did not need to show actual injury or special damage to establish standing (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d 668, 687; Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
The Court stated: "the petitioners live in close proximity to the portion of the site that is the subject of the challenged determinations, they did not need to show actual injury or special damage to establish standing (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d 668, 687; Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:08 am
Additional Resources: Walsh v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:30 am
Pijan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
That's not to say it never happens, but it's rare, as Nielson v. [read post]
