Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 6181 - 6200 of 6,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm by Venkat
Twitter could have reduced its need to be the instrument of government censorship by keeping its assets and personnel within the borders of the United States, where legal protections exist like CDA 230 and the DMCA safe harbors (which do require takedowns but also give a path, albeit a lousy one, for republication). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
For the answers, look no further than last month’s unpublished decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Vito M. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
The banks understand that because so few consumers (a) read the fine print; (b) understand what this language and idea is about; and (c) are motivated to take affirmative steps to opt out, only the smallest percentage of consumers notice and act upon this right. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
In the preamble to the Sec. 503 NPRM, the OFCCP explained that the EEOC’s ADA regulations (at 29 CFR Part 1630.1(c)(2)) permit employers to conduct a pre-offer inquiry into disability status if it is made pursuant to a federal, state or local law requiring affirmative action for individuals with disabilities. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:25 pm by Don Asher
The limitations on the use of mechanical equipment during the performance of roofing work on low-slope roofs. 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(v). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
  Maybe… The age of drugs / Dalrymple (Illus. in: Puck, v. 48, no. 1231 (1900 October 10), centerfold). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
In that article he wrote that “[c]onservatives need to realize that their audience is not [simply] composed of … lawyers. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A private detective has only the right of a private person with respect to arrest, Dohery v. [read post]