Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 16,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
When you are on the wrong side of a State v.____ ticket, chances are you have done (or at least been accused of doing) something dumb. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
When you are on the wrong side of a State v.____ ticket, chances are you have done (or at least been accused of doing) something dumb. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
While the “Deep State” is a phantom which plays on fears of power that cannot be called to account, “depth” is a real and valuable attribute of this state, one which underwrites continuity, consistency, competence, and collaboration. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See Getting v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:55 am
The news report seems to suggest that this position was arrived at only through a strong presumption of marriage in case of proven long cohabitation, rather than accepting that they are different categories that need to be treated similarly.Given the politically volatile nature of family laws, the courts has generally been cautious in applying modern constitutional principles to these laws (particularly the infamous State of Bombay v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:38 am
”, is to put pressure on the state legislature to make Arizona the 38th ratifying state to satisfy Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
Reay v Beamont reminds us though that, where peculiar facts arise, the position is not so straightforward. 3. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:39 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
But states where capital punishment has strong support, including Virginia and Texas, have let juries decide. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
” As we said in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
The Court stated that the employer’s argument in favor of the exemption was strong but that more facts were needed based on the Second Circuit’s “very narrow” interpretation of the administrative exemption. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
McGuan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
On page 9 of his speech he stated: I will argue that the principle of subsidiarity requires the Court to accept that on issues of social policy such as prisoner voting, where strong, opposing reasonable views may be held and where Parliament has fully debated the issue, the judgement as to the appropriate system of disenfranchisement of prisoners is for Parliament and the Court should not interfere with that judgement unless it is manifestly without reasonable foundation. [read post]
2 May 2008, 3:42 am
"Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Information Commissioner and Friends of the Earth (pdf) [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
He has strong views--including that the United States should abide by the Geneva Conventions that we championed and signed and that the U.S. should not allow torture, putting him in the same camp as that dangerous radical Sen. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
United States and some miscellaneous examples drawn from congressional records. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Troxel v. [read post]
