Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 6181 - 6200 of 9,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
Woodward, and authorizing the taking of a corporate franchise giving exclusive rights to cross a river for public use); Thorpe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm by Mac Kelly
 And because “every court holds a duty to ensure it has jurisdiction to hear the claims before it,” Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The words we use provide a filter through which we view and acknowledge legal concepts. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Second, the going and coming rule is to be applied narrowly, and third, the reasoning of the California Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
”  As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
”  As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,588,863 owned by Brass Smith LLC and entitled SNEEZE GUARDS AND METHODS FOR THEIR CONSTRUCTION AND USE. [read post]