Search for: "Action Communications Inc"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 10,899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
The Court reasoned that if the company made the decisions about who would be fired, as they did in Up in the Air, they would not be insulated from liability by the contractor, who would merely be communicating the information to the employees. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
As a consequence, the headmaster was precluded from enforcing the settlement agreement, ruled a Florida state court of appeal in Gulliver Schools Inc v Snay. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
As a consequence, the headmaster was precluded from enforcing the settlement agreement, ruled a Florida state court of appeal in Gulliver Schools Inc v Snay. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
Big Inc., 2013 HRTO 2009 (Ont. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
But there is a fine line between off-label promotion of a drug and allowing manufacturers to communicate dosing or other important information on off-label uses to practitioners in cases where they already plan (as is their right) to invoke off-label use in a treatment plan. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:30 am
Months ago, for example, Illinois firearms company ArmaLite Inc. launched a communications campaign to promote its most successful product, a rifle called the “AR-50A1”. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
But if Aereo is the performer, the opposite conclusion seems required, since the relationship between Aereo, Inc. and its paying subscribers is very likely a public one. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 1:12 pm
Employers considering skinny plans and the brokers, third party administrators (TPAs), insurers and consultants recommending the use of these arrangements alone or as part of a broader health plan design should seek qualified legal advice for help with structuring and implementing these arrangements to avoid potential traps and missteps that could trigger unanticipated benefits, costs and/or tax consequences. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
Penney Corporation, Inc., Limelight Networks, Inc., Netflix, Inc., Newegg Inc., Red Hat, Inc., SAP America, Inc., SAS Institute Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., the American Bar Association, the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago, Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh, and Yahoo! [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
In addition, having just read yesterday’s post on statutory safe harbors for consumer claims, we wonder whether this action falls into California’s safe harbor for “business practices which the Legislature has expressly declared to be lawful in other legislation,” see Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The ruling, made by Wake County Judge Paul Ridgeway, stems from legal action taken by the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) in 2012, Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
The allegations plausibly describe an invitation to common action, and to have RPX coordinate that action. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:10 pm
For important information concerning this communication click here. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Stack, CPA, Principal, Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is an expert in employer communication systems and part of the Amaxx team helping companies reduce their workers compensation costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Medtronic, Inc., U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
Beyond this 2014 guidance, Covered Entities and their business associates also should look at enforcement actions and data as well as other guidance OCR issued during 2013 after publishing the Omnibus Final Rule such as: HIPAA Privacy Rule: Disclosures for Emergency Preparedness – A Decision Tool The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Refill Reminders and Other Communications about a Drug or Biologic Currently Being Prescribed for the Individual Health Information of Deceased… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 5:50 pm
To allow plans time to implement the arrangements to adjust plans and coordinate communications, the FAQ states that only for the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, where a group health plan or group health insurance issuer uses more than one service provider to administer benefits that are subject to the annual limitation on out-of-pocket maximums under ACA §§ 2707(a) or 2707(b), the Departments will consider the annual limitation on out-of-pocket maximums to… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
For important information concerning this communication click here. [read post]
