Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6201 - 6220 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  At the Arizona Republic, Erin Kelly discusses the nomination prospects of former Arizona governor and current Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, whom experts say would bring diversity of experience to the Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:42 am by Steve Hall
  Earlier coverage of these Arizona and Ohio cases begins at the link. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:00 am by Liah Caravalho
  The event commemorated both the 50th anniversary of the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:58 am by Jon Lewis
Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the country, followed by 13 U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm by Paul Freehling
The Supreme Court made specific reference to statutes in Arizona, Iowa, Kansas, North Carolina, Ohio, and Oklahoma. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:29 am by Irene
Supreme Court upheld a key provision of Arizona’s law (SB 1070) allowing police officers to check the immigration status of individuals arrested or stopped for questioning. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by WSLL
The United States Supreme Court has held that such a use is proper and not in contravention of a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
While I’ve been picking what I think are the top 5 Gavel to Gavel stories of 2011, I give you the “reader’s choice” awards if you will: the Top 10 most viewed posts (in order): AZ: Effort to ban court use of sharia law, canon law, halacha, and karma (under threat of impeachment) reintroduced (2/4/11) Ohio Issue 1: Supreme Court Commissions? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 am by Russ Bensing
Arizona, the 1966 ruling which required police to give a four-part warning to suspects before interrogation. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
One point of difficulty here is the Supreme Court’s precedent in Walden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm by Howard Wasserman
Both changes were made against the backdrop of Supreme Court and lower-court decisions cases treating the existing limitations periods as not subject to equitable tolling, as well as a similar legal position by the Department of Justice. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:24 pm
--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004) The landmark United States Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:38 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
On Tuesday, a federal district court in Louisiana looked favorably on another suit against the CMS rule, this one filed by fourteen states (Louisiana, Montana, Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio). [read post]