Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
Cleare v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
As the US Supreme court explained in Broadrick v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:40 am
United States Dist. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:10 pm
The death to all pedophiles freight train sweeping the nation has stopped at the door of the United States Supreme Court in the form of Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
On March 18, 2008, the New York Court of Appeals, which is New York's highest court, decided Appleton Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:53 am
” McLaughlin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:50 am
But most of section one is written in abstract and vague language combining standards, principles, and terms of art; it speaks of "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States," "due process of law," and "equal protection of the laws. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
United States, 529 U.S. 172, 191 (1997)]; United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
The en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
