Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2018, 6:50 am
This division of risk is old, originally established in 18th Century English law (in the case of Price v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
" Minnesota v. [read post]
PA Supreme Court Confirms “Magic” Language Cannot Save Otherwise Unenforceable Non-Compete Agreement
30 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
The full opinion, Socko v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
English: Alexandria, Virginia U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
(Commercially available reagents, known synthetic procedures, well known textbook in English, granted U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:21 am
See: Authors Guild v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
District Court, Eastern District of California (EEOC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
And another one for those who prefer English. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:29 am
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has licensed virtually unlimited expansion of federal criminal law in cases such as Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
The United States, by custom, rather than law, continued to use traditional English weights and measurements. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
The issues for the Supreme Court concern the proper approach to be taken to an Article 13(b) defence in child abduction cases; and the interaction between the domestic approach to the Convention and that of the European Court of Human Rights, following the ECHR case of Neulinger and Shuruk v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 7:24 am
Seriously, White has some rights based on Two Pesos v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:39 am
In LaPerriere v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:01 am
No. 33 Given that Nigeria’s legal system is “based on the English common law legal tradition,” in addition to the above laws, judicial precedents control matters relating to elections. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
I'm sure we'll return to this subject of the difference between meanings and intentions, perhaps to discuss Berg v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:29 am
See alsoFurther comments on Feb. 8 arguments in Tafas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The recent district court decision in Minnesota, Tri-Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
… Canadian Appeals MonitorBC Court of Appeal Confirms Application of Statutory Interpretation Principles in Reasonableness Review, Including Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence In English v Richmond (City), 2021 BCCA 442, Justices Frankel and DeWitt-Van Oosten of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (the “BCCA”) considered an appeal from an order requiring the issuance of a building permit for a cannabis greenhouse on land within the provincially regulated… [read post]
