Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 30,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 pm
[A] penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held in Prager University v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
(Under Myers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
New Relists Newton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
The Court carefully considered the guidance from Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270, setting out how to assess this concept. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 12:09 pm
Even anonymous posts will have metadata, such as IP addresses (C-582/14, Breyer v Germany), which can be used to identify the poster. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
Serova v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
In Alden v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa law also prohibits local governments, such as cities and counties, from setting minimum wages higher than the state rate. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Sony Third Circuit Says Google Isn’t State Actor–Jayne v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:07 am
The tribunal found that Romania had breached the terms of the BIT by failing to ensure fair and equitable treatment, respect the claimants’ legitimate expectations and act transparently. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court currently has on its docket various cases pitting one or more states against the federal government, such as Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:47 pm
United States, 365 U.S. 85, 96 (1961) (where the government had the advantage of having a witness in its employ, stating that “the ordinary rule, based on considerations of fairness, does not place the burden upon a litigant of establishing facts peculiarly within the knowledge of his adversary”) [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled that 'time-shifting' constitutes fair use. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
Bird Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
In the 1968 case Pickering v. [read post]
