Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 14,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
See also In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (First Amendment precluded product liability action). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:16 am
Be sure you understand how you’re supposed to take the medication and the correct dosage. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
We’re counting the days, and we hope to see you there . . . . [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
Real justice practiced by smart judges in Florida is all about being re-elected preferably without any opposition. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
Either you’re creating your own brand or you’re allowing the marketplace to do it for you (eek). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
If you’re interested, have a read here. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:45 am
Licensing or selling a brand name or a technology to a company in China. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:01 am
The epidemiologic evidence available at this time indicates that JEM Raw brand sprouted nut butter spreads are the likely source of this outbreak. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:42 pm
They’re not just businesses; they’re supposed to provide a vital public service, and they depend on public trust. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:27 pm
They're clean. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:20 am
Certain activities, including the sale or use of data for targeted advertising, unauthorized re-identification of data, and unauthorized re-contacting of PMI participants should be expressly prohibited. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
” Glick assisted Defendant Townsend in her re-write and re-brand of a novel, including creation of the title “The Forlorned. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Now we’re talking the good kind of funky. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
(“Mortein” is a brand of insecticide, so that may have done the deed.) [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:34 am
’ You’re not watching David Banner—you’re watching the Hulk. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
It will be followed by another offering a thought or two on how brands, from lifestyle dictators, may be en route to exile from consumer life, ‘cleansed’ and re-defined by a new regulatory paternalism. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
And what is it we’re saying here? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:26 am
Does it matter when you’re ordering a beer at a local establishment? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:36 am
Applicant argued that confusion is impossible because the involved goods "cannot even be lawfully sold to the general public under the same roof" and "they are branded under distinguishable marks that explicitly say the products come from fundamentally different types of enterprises. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:06 am
As such, a ‘good faith’ scheme was introduced for rights-owners who had previously given accurate takedown information; prove yourself reliable (as over 400 international brands have) and the takedown process is accelerated and less time-intensive. [read post]
