Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:13 pm
In Kress et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:19 pm
The US Solicitor General has petitioned for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm
The limitation can be found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dewsnup v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:06 pm
Judge Richard Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Baskin v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
Yesterday, in Jaynes v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 10:03 am
On May 23, 2025, the Texas Supreme Court issued a long-awaited opinion in Cromwell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Since its troubling nineteenth-century origins in Kagama v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm
Cvent sued 18 months later (why so long?). [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
LEXIS 35325 (SD CA, March 17, 2014), a California federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that, among other things, he was denied a Qur'an and hindered in the practice of his Muslim faith.In Long v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
[Long citation to Richards]. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
On Wednesday in Robertson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:31 pm
(See Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
"State senators who remain supporters of the death penalty, starting with their way-too-long-time president, Thomas V. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:55 am
The news report seems to suggest that this position was arrived at only through a strong presumption of marriage in case of proven long cohabitation, rather than accepting that they are different categories that need to be treated similarly.Given the politically volatile nature of family laws, the courts has generally been cautious in applying modern constitutional principles to these laws (particularly the infamous State of Bombay v. [read post]
