Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 123,268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
First, based on comparative research, it offers a conceptual analysis of six distinctive meanings of judges and judiciaries as (i) single persons, (ii) conglomerations, (iii) institutions, (iv) collective actors, (v) cases, and (vi) symbolic ideals. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
On June 8, 2023, the court, in a 7-2 decision, ruled in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
Thompson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
The court upheld the firing of a correctional officer who posted seemingly racist comments on his personal social media page. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Gregory v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
By Alec Lesseliers Introduction The British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET), and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum are a few of the world’s most famous and largest history museums with objects in their collection from all over the world. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Here is the abstract: In Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
See Range v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Basulto v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
However, in ICollege (Pty) Ltd v Xpertease Skills Development and Mentoring CC and Another decided in May, it appears that the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa followed a different line of reasoning.BackgroundThis was an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Pretoria which dismissed the appellant’s application for an injunction restraining the first respondent from infringing the appellant’s rights acquired through the registration of its trade marks; and from… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am
The BDO Seidman Test No treatment of New York’s law of restrictive covenants would be complete without mention of the Court of Appeals’ seminal decision in BDO Seidman v Hirshberg (93 NY2d 382 [1999]). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Rosenbury, Reflections on “Personal Responsibility” after COVID and Dobbs: Doubling Down on Privacy, 972 Wash. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
On Friday 16 June 2023 there was a pre-trial review the case of Zhurba v Person(s) Unknown before Nicklin J. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm
Rutledge v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]
