Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 7,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
The judge's full opinion in Commisioner of Minnesota Dept. of Ag v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
nostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury (IPKat) ECJ rules on scope of fair compensation for private copying exceptions: Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Authores y Editores de España (SGAE) Case C-467/08 (JIPLP) India Patentability of method/process claims- Application of recent US case law to the Indian Patent Act section 3(k) (Spicy IP) Ireland Ireland joins copyright review queue (IPKat) Netherlands Court… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
At FindLaw, Sherry Colb discusses Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The Iowa Court of Appeals in Gazette Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:45 am
The Iowa Court of Appeals in Gazette Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:25 am
Looks like the guy got a bonus round. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:30 pm
Double jeopardy not enough to prevent deportation QJ (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1478 (21 December 2010): The High Court have said that an Algerian should be deported despite the risk of “double jeopardy” as he would be tried for the same or similar offence as back in Algeria as he had been in the UK. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:52 am
In a forthcoming article in the Notre Dame Law Review, The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action, Professor Richard Nagareda draws interesting connections between the question whether state law can bar use of the class action device in federal court – the issue in last Term’s Shady Grove v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:04 am
Schempp, Miranda v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The decision by the United States to support the Declaration was the result of a thorough review of the Declaration by the relevant federal agencies.1 In conducting its review of the Declaration, U.S. agencies consulted extensively with tribal leaders during three rounds of consultations, one in Rapid City, South Dakota, and two in Washington, D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
Coverage of health-care reform continues, as Adam mentioned in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
This complaint was upheld because in the particular circumstances of the case the first and second applicants would not have been able to marry without a whip-round for the fee. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
Yesterday’s round-up collected coverage of the cert. denial in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
