Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 121,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 12:09 pm
However, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
See Google Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:54 am
(See Musk, Elon). [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:37 am
If you require legal assistance, please see a lawyer. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:37 am
If you require legal assistance, please see a lawyer. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:12 am
In particular, seafaring employers should now take particular notice of their employees’ wages, even where their vessels are foreign-flagged and they have little connection to the UK. 1 See, for example, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Art. 942 Diggins v Condor Marine Crewing Services Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 11333 Maritime Labor Convention, Regulation A2.4(2)4Seahorse Maritime Ltd. v Nautilus International [2018] EWCA Civ 27895 Trade Union and Labour… [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:35 am
See McGirt, 140 S. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
Q: West Virginia v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 7:01 am
The following is by my FIU colleague Alex Erwin. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
After some hesitation (see below), Google Bard has accepted that there is no such case. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:30 pm
Visit the Legal Developments page to see the latest topics, which also include breaking legal news and related Practical Guidance content. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the right for prior use… [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:32 am
See Gonzales v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:29 am
” See Iowa Code § 654B.3(1)(b). [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
An application by the claimants to rely on new evidence was rejected by the judge (see Telegraph report [£]). [read post]