Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 6201 - 6220 of 23,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
The court considered previous decisions where a range of intermediaries, including real estate agents (Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60), television broadcasters (Universal Telecasters (Qld) Ltd v Guthrie [1978] FCA 9) and newspapers (Australian Ocean Line Pty Ltd v West Australian Newspapers Ltd [(1985) [1985] FCA 37), had not been liable for misleading and deceptive conduct for merely displaying advertising. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
The company stated in its defense that the managers weren’t liable, since they didn’t “exercise control” over the employee’s FMLA activities. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
submit=rss_sho&shofile=11-1256_001.pdf … B-SDNY:Great end chart summarizes surviving Lehman alleg. v JPM w/both sides' positions & Ct rationale for no dismissal http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY: Cplt that JPM put “fin. gun to LBHI's head" etc by threatening to stop clearing services states valid claims… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm by Jerry Brito
Minnesota and New York Times Co. v U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am by Cody M. Poplin
Don’t know much about Wu Tien Lu-Shou v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 5:40 am
The only other thing I'd like to mention is the phrase "a kind of 'Underground Railroad for abortion.'" This isn't the first place I'm seeing the idea to be deprived of access to abortion is slavery. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
You’d think that when women ask that question of men in France, they’d be receptive. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am by Florian Mueller
"In mid-2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had upheld three claims of that patent, including one Apple asserted against Samsung in the 2012 trial (and the related 2013 retrial).Apple still hasn't given up on its European rubberbanding patent. [read post]