Search for: "State v. Agent" Results 6201 - 6220 of 11,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 8:20 am by John Jascob
However, the court requested additional documentation from the SEC regarding the issue of disgorgement, and imposed the minimum third-tier penalty on the firm’s principal (SEC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm by Larry
So, let's get started.Do you remember United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
While the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its recent judgment Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (discussed here), does not mention the words “measures of mass surveillance” it states that it is concerned about measures “authoris[ing], on a generalised basis, storage of all the personal data of all the persons”. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
CopyrightDigital Single Market EU Member States are due to implement the Digital Copyright Directive by 7 June 2021. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:10 am by Susan Brenner
Special Agent Kevin Shirley of the OIG Chicago Field Office began to participate in the investigation of Linder. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-752Issues: (1) Whether a government agent’s direction to a wireless carrier to send a signal to a person’s phone, so that the phone reveals the person’s precise location and movements in real time, is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether a government agent’s good faith but objectively incorrect reading of a statute prevents the exclusion of constitutionally tainted evidence in a criminal trial. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm by Team
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]