Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 6201 - 6220 of 37,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am by Matthew DeVries
  In a transportation case involving a personal injury, Department of Transportation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am by Matthew DeVries
  In a transportation case involving a personal injury, Department of Transportation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Geoff Schweller
MLK/FBI is the festival’s centerpiece film: it uncovers and documents the extent of the FBI’s harassment of Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
The head of the Spanish state, King Felipe VI, represents the unity and continuity of the states institutions. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick T. Ryan
It then rejected the argument that nothing in Rule 23 prohibits a negotiation class as failing to recognize the Supreme Court’s guidance in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
 The Appellate Division observed that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law ' 240(1Bb)(c)(7), the court may direct a parent to contribute to a child=s education. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]