Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 7:23 am
In this week’s case (Kalaora v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:42 am
And while there are significant exceptions (most notably, Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See FEF v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:54 am
The opinion is styled, Danuta Lobeck v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:29 am
NEW YORK—The Justice Department alleged May 3 a wholly owned Deutsche Bank AG subsidiary fraudulently misrepresented its mortgage lending and underwriting practices for years while participating in a federal mortgage-insurance program that to date has led to $386 million in losses (United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
By Erin Nedenia Reid In a departure from the recent trend of courts refusing to allow data breach claimants to seek mitigation damages, the First Circuit recently held in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:04 am
All Matador locations within the State of Washington will change the colors of their table top menu holders, change certain menu descriptions, and stop using two particular menu titles. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:40 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am
Essentially, a trademark gives a holder the right to prevent others from using the same mark where there is a likelihood of confusion as to source. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
Like this op-ed in today's New York Times about the Supreme Court's refusal to hear Rasul v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:30 am
In the recent cybersquatting case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll aka Joe Comeau FA1336979 (Nat. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
And of course, the holder of any junior mortgage. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:28 pm
” The court applied the Wang v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:49 pm
They contended that Bayer paid generic drug companies to delay entry into the prescription drug market, thereby blocking the entry of low-cost generic versions of Cipro.The court stated the question as: "whether patent settlements in which the generic firm agrees to delay entry into the market in exchange for payment fall within the scope of the patent holder’s property rights, or whether such settlements are properly characterized as illegal market-sharing agreements. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:32 am
In Bandyopadhyay v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
Waterbury v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Crespo v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm
INA 212 (9)(B)(v) provides for the waiver of the three and ten year bar only for an individual “who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
