Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6201 - 6220
of 29,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2022, 9:25 am
California’s Statewide Cannabis Regulatory Scheme California has a dual regulatory scheme for cannabis licensing – meaning licensure or permitting is required at both the state and local level. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 12:57 pm
High on my list are cases as Kelo v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:24 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm
Illinois, along with several other states, have initiated the re-sentencing of those who received life terms as juveniles following the 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:49 am
Greenberg, 126 N.J. 168, 192 (1991) (citing State v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
But they also have an expressive level: a creative SSO. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:11 pm
Apocalypse Now: The Unrelenting Assault on Morton v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:45 am
The EAW is designed to create a simplified and accelerated procedure for extradition based on a high level of confidence between EU member states. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:00 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
Yesterday, the First Department extended this ruling to level three sex offenders in Matter of Gilmore v Hernandez, 2007 NY Slip Op 04233. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:52 pm
In Setianto v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm
Justice Kennedy and Chief Justice Roberts got the ASG to commit that the government’s position necessitated a view that anybody charged with any crime, at any level – municipal, state or federal – could find their untainted assets frozen after being charged, and thus be unable to hire private counsel, solely for the purpose of paying a potential fine or money judgment in the event they were later convicted.The proposition clearly did not sit well with a number of… [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:02 am
The court relied on its earlier judgment in Adeokin Records & another v MCSN (SC/336/2008), reported on the 1709 Blog, here.The Court observed that, similar to the situation in Adeokin Records, the rights in issue at the trial court level had been obtained prior to the commencement date of the Copyright Amendment Decree No. 42 of 1999 (specifically section 17 of the Nigerian Copyright Act): see pages 30-32 of the decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:17 pm
A critical post on the Chamber judgment in Delfi AS v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:08 pm
State, 852 So. 2d 833, 836 (Ala. 2002). [read post]
8 May 2008, 10:41 pm
EPA, Friends of the Earth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
Does the testing depend on the type of part and the level of risk posed by a failure of the part? [read post]
