Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 45,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 4:52 pm
We cite the ever helpful Wikipedia: Apple v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:40 am
Traditionally, people sentenced to imprisonment for a felony went to state prison, while those sentenced to imprisonment for misdemeanors went to county jail. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
See Reece v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
This is Part 2 of a post discussing the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
On December 29, 2011, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Many people are saying we need a new Court, with proposals for significant reforms such as term limits and court expansion gaining much more mainstream support than imagined twenty years ago (even after Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:27 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 10:14 am
Cadleway Properties v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 8:28 am
In Percoco v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
When I propose that the Supreme Court follow the state courts and apply a reasonable regulation standard, invariably people object that strict scrutiny absolutely must apply. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
The NC AGO recently also filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Haro v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:20 am
In the case of Snyder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Indeed, as Justice Scalia suggested, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
North Carolina General Statutes state that spouses can recover damages from each other for tortuous acts in the same way that unmarried people can[1]. [read post]
