Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
(Ilya Somin) Today is the fifth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
In Strate v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
23 May 2025, 1:38 pm
Bessent and March 7 in the NLRB case, Wilcox v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
Last month, the attorneys general for eleven different states petitioned the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:56 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
, Wellman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 1:55 am
Corporations often push for self-regulation to avoid state regulation. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
This isn’t self-correcting. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Woollard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:09 am
As it was pointed out in Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Yes the Secretary of State has a power to include other forms of ill-treatment falling short of actual violence within s 177(1), but that had not been done because the SoS already believed that the word bore that wider meaning. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:48 am
In the recent case of Sarkisian v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:42 am
The case is SA Broadcasting Corporation (SOC) Ltd and Another v Motsoeneng and Others (A2022/046784) [2024] ZAGPJHC 688 (30 July 2024). [read post]
