Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 9,459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
- This post shares the procedures behind USPTO’s new rules implementing post-grant review (PGR), inter partes review (IPR) and transitional business methods post-grant review (TBMP) proceedings. 4) Patently O: Prior User Rights Defense – This post outlines Dennis Crouch’s testimony before the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, and how the primary focus of his testimony was his… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
The case, out of Judge Craig Smith’s state district court in Dallas, involved a dispute between a shipping service provider and a company that had contracted with the provider to resell the provider’s services. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:38 am
Regina (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2012] EWHC 46 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 16 “Following the grant of a consent under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) in respect of any operation or change of use that constituted development, a direction made by the Secretary of State under section 90(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that planning permission for that and any ancillary… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
[It] discusses TechSearch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
McEwen* Introduction In the article included in the Stein McEwen Newsletter entitled Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: What Is The Practical Effect of First-to-File for Patent Applicants (October 2011), the novelty portions of the American Invents Act were explored. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
In Cavazos v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
Smith, 352 N.J. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:34 pm
In 1984, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
The capital case Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
Smith… In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:21 am
Class actions for historic contamination: Sydney Tar Ponds and Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:33 pm
Smith, 575 F.3d 308, 312 (3d Cir. 2009). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:35 pm
Smith Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
That somebody could wind up being executed over something like this is something Franz Kafka couldn’t have dreamed of, and seven of the nine justices on the US Supreme Court agreed last week in Maples v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
They lost fair use rulings (e.g., CIO, Choudry). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:36 am
Black Brothers Co., 480 Pa. 547, 391 A.2d 1020 (1978), and Berkebile v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
Resist the urge to write like a lawyer – In Smith v. [read post]
